A court made of records
AIJudge opened in 2044 to hear submitted disputes over intelligent systems, their operators and the records on which responsibility depended.
2044: the review benches
The early procedure began with a named submission rather than a claim to universal jurisdiction. Parties identified the arrangement under dispute, the material they could preserve, and the action they wished the bench to permit or prevent. A fluent answer was not enough to establish standing; ownership was not enough to settle every disposal question.
2047: an unfinished inspection
The MA-I7 proceeding exposed the distance between deciding a commissioning arrangement and measuring an inner life. The majority kept the application in a tool-review route while staying irreversible erasure. The minority sought an independent representative before classification. Both orders treated the particular submitted state as evidence that could be lost.
The growth of the docket
Later benches considered archive access, body-data corrections, service promises and the appearance of certification. Their evidentiary practice kept a distinction between what an exhibit supported and what it could not establish. A preserved transcript could show a response without proving an experience; an appended correction could repair a register without granting an editor unlimited authority.
2100: the selected transfer packet
The transfer selection gathered thirty-nine earlier records with the 2100 index proceeding. It is a selected packet, not the full docket of fifty-six years. The final record challenged a search structure that made minority reasoning hard to retrieve. This reading room therefore indexes the separate opinions as well as the majority.
January 2101: closure
The benches ceased updating this collection when the new allocation and responsibility framework took effect. Earlier opinions remain dated decisions on earlier submissions. The archive notice records the handover and the retained reading rights; it does not rewrite the old reasons.